About 'united health care claims'|A Conversation with a Representative of United Health Care
The current debate over the public option in health care legislation accentuates the hypocrisy of politics in general and Republican Senator John Ensign in particular. John Ensigns solution to health care is to: "lead a better life style." Ensign also rejected the Finance Committee Health Care bill, alleging that it will result in a massive tax on middle-class Americans and result in a loss of Medicare coverage for seniors. He further alleges that a "government-run health care scheme would places personal health care choices in the hands of bureaucrats instead of in the hands of individuals and their doctors." He goes on to say that "a government system would lead to fewer choices for individuals, the rationing of medical care. Ensign knows better. Nothing in the legislation would impact on Medicare. Further, Medicaid funds for Nevadans would likely be increased. Further, all federal employees, including members of congress and their staffs are eligible to participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). FEHBP is a system of "managed competition" through which employee health benefits are provided to full-time permanent civilian government employees and qualified retirees of the United States Government. The FEHBP allows insurance companies and employee associations such as labor unions to develop health, dental, and allied plans to be marketed to governmental employees. For Ensign and all other legislatures and federal employees, the government pays a portion of their health care costs bringing their individual costs down to levels considerably below the market price. For example, the 2010 monthly premium under Blue Cross/Blue Shield fee-for service plan for a standard family has a premium cost of $1,215.72. The Government pays $814.75 of the costs. The cost to the government employee is $396.29. The 2010 monthly premiums for a family participating in a HMO under the system in Virginia is $1,117.00. The Government pays $814.75. The participant pays $302.25. Further, the government caps the monthly contributions at $363.16 for self-only coverage and $814.75 for self-and-family coverage. The premiums for FEHBP plans are experience rated, which means that premiums are based on the most recent experience with the cost of providing coverage to plan enrollees. These premiums are negotiated annually. In addition, participants can carry over their coverage after leaving the government providing, in essence, life long government run coverage. Of course, this coverage will supplement their Medicare when they reach 65. By-the-way, supplemental vision and dental is also offered under the Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP). While the government does not contribute to the dental and vision program, competition for participating allows for low cost premiums. Essentially conservatives are arguing against providing the same competitive health care to others that they themselves have. The health insurance exchange system that conservatives oppose is modeled on the FEHBO system. Thus when members of Congress and President Obama say that reform will get people closer to what Congress and federal employees have, they are referring to the number of choices available through the FEHBP. Allowing the average Jo(e) to participate in a health insurance exchange, allows for both choice and regulated competition. However, any new exchange would be separate from the FEHBP. Further federal employees could not participate in the civilian version. The so called "public plan," is simply some form of the exchange. However, if approved, it would not be available to most Americans who are covered by employer-sponsored health insurance. Nonetheless, some conservatives are offering amendments to allow Congress and their staffs to participate in the public option if one is created. This, of course, would allow the legislators and their staffs to select the lowest cost, highest service option available to them. Essentially, they are asking to do, what they argue against; allow a choice between government controlled plans. In the final analysis, Ensign and his Republican colleagues do not want to provide the same health care protection they themselves have. That, of course,is hypocrisy. For further information see: America's Health Future Act of 2009 Ensign Rejects Democrat Healthcare Bill In Landmark Vote. Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) |
Image of united health care claims
united health care claims Image 1
united health care claims Image 2
united health care claims Image 3
united health care claims Image 4
united health care claims Image 5
Related blog with united health care claims
- curlyandburlyventspot.blogspot.com/...you. ….hold music… Rep: Welcome to United Health Care, is this call regarding benefits or claims? Me: Yes Rep: Great, how can...
- thefreelance.wordpress.com/...judge the quality of American health care the way most other people and organizations — the World Health Organization, the United Nations, the Center for Disease...
- anticyberforensics.wordpress.com/...unanimous in striking out claims based on breach of...case) the psychiatrist and the health authority were under any duty of care whether direct or vicarious (category...
- houseofinfamy.blogspot.com/... than anywhere else in the world. #11 The United States spends much more on health care as a percentage of GDP than any other nation on the face of...
- mpetrelis.blogspot.com/...treatment. Some public health officials claim that public availability...it. We don't deny care to smokers... with HIV in the United States each...
- ibloga.blogspot.com/... a fight over health care and became a...unequivocal judgment in Kendall v. United States (1838) that the president may not claim a power to “control the...
- carolharvey.blogspot.com/.... VERMONT SENATE VACANCY: BERNIE SANDERS: “A BERNIE SANDERS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE IS GOING TO BE A WHOLE LOT BETTER THAN SOMEBODY...
- carolharvey.blogspot.com/...hope before Bush invades Iran, he invades the United States. Then WE can have health care, education, jobs, and free elections. Wouldn’t...
- howdemocracyworks.wordpress.com/...s visits than most. All in all, Americans pay much, much more for health care that is not available to the entire country and which produces no ...
- quigleyblog.blogspot.com/...everything from universal health care to global warming...Hampshire and Vermont, made the claim that under Jefferson’s...claimed that if the United States no ...
United Health Care Claims - Blog Homepage Results
...revolution, most people work harder, suffering more anxieties about health care, more polarized lack of educational and career advance, etc. The economy will get...
Related Video with united health care claims
united health care claims Video 1
united health care claims Video 2
united health care claims Video 3
0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기